yrmencyn: (qc - drunk)
This started out as a reply comment on the previous entry, but it started ballooning to proportions that I would deem excessive for a comment.

So, here's the thing: the subtext to my dislike of that vodka-based evil is that I really have a great dislike for vodka in general.  Let me talk through this. 

Vodka is supposed to be flavorless, yes?  In a truly perfect, Platonic-form sort of way, vodka is served at approximately 32 degrees Fahrenheit, and feels like nothing so much as an ice-cold fire in your belly.  And in that incarnation, I'm totally on board: give me some frigid vodka (I've always wanted to drink it out of a hollowed out ice block!), some smoked salmon, and some rye bread, and we can call it a party.

But then somewhere along the way, vodka got everywhere, especially into mixed drinks, and this is where things went horribly, horribly wrong.  It's a flavorless liquor.  So in a mixed drink/cocktail, it serves no purpose but to increase the alcohol content of the drink in question.  It brings nothing else to the table: no flavor, no spice, no qualities that can be layered and toyed with -- zero.  It's a liquor whose entire point is to lead to drunkenness as a goal, rather than as a place you might happen end up thanks to enjoying a good, well-constructed drink.

So in, for example, a vodka mojito, you're only getting mint and lime, without that hint of cane flavor that a clear rum brings.  Or in that most demonic of liquid abortions, the vodka martini, you're basically asking the bartender to please give you a pointy glass of nothing (except that in many bars it's actually a pointy glass of Absolut, which tastes alarming of chemical blech [I really, really, really dislike Absolut -- it's good for nothing]).

But what about fruity drinks?  You know, 'girl drinks'?  Well, just to put all my cards on the table: I think they're mostly vile, over-sugared cups of badly named crap.  For the few that aren't -- and I'll include, for example, the venerable Cosmopolitan -- I think they might benefit a lot from a clear rum, and probably more from an amber rum.  But that's beside the point.  Most fruity drinks seem designed to taste as little of alcohol as possible.  And while I think that's... well, a little silly, frankly, but whatever... it's not necessary to go for vodka.  A good liquor will have balanced flavor without reeking of alcohol (and in fact, most mid-level rums/whiskeys/gins/etc taste far less 'alcoholic' to my palate than comparable vodkas), no matter what kind it is.

So I guess in the long run I think vodka's a waste of space.  I'd be perfectly happy if all the bars got rid of all their vodka, except for a couple bottles stashed in the freezer.  Then maybe some bar patron might actually order a *gasp* decent drink.  And I wouldn't have to specify a gin martini, which is annoyingly redundant.

Am I an elitist snob?  Probably.  But I'm also right, which helps.
yrmencyn: (Default)
So, who here's ever posted their creative work online, where anyone can see, FOR ABSOLUTELY FREE OMG?  Well, guess what: Howard Hendrix, VP of The Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America, thinks that you're a webscab, one "who [posts] their creations on the net for free. A scab is someone who works for less than union wages or on non-union terms; more broadly, a scab is someone who feathers his own nest and advances his own career by undercutting the efforts of his fellow workers to gain better pay and working conditions for all."  Now, he's technically explicitly referring to SciFi writers [within his organization], that being his field, but I doubt he'd look any more favorably on any other sort of author releasing work for free.

This is ridiculous.  A writer who posts his work online for free is in no wise a scab (and that word?  that's a huge word, jeezus).  A writer who utilizes the resources  of the internet and emerging technology is certainly working to 'advance his own career,' but hardly to the detriment of others.  In fact, those who do so are pioneers in a still-unorganized domain with possibilities that haven't yet been even partly developed, and it is only through their efforts that the rest of the writing world can finally come to appreciate the resources of current technology.

There are, of course, a number of very good reasons why one would want to avoid free online publication -- if nothing else, it can hurt your possibilities of publication later (how ironic), especially for works like poetry, which are generally small and easily accessible online.  That being said:

I believe that an author has the right to use his own work as he desires without fear of insult.
I believe that those who fail to accept the advances of technology are doomed to be erased by them.
I believe that a strong online community of writers enhances 'working conditions' for all involved.
I believe that a strong online community of writers can do nothing but increase public awareness of the immense variety of literature that exists.

And as a token of these beliefs, a symbolic gesture, one I'm making along with hundreds of other writers: have a poem.  It's mine, so don't try to pass it off as your own, post it elsewhere without my permission, alter it, or otherwise infringe on my rights as a creator.  I, in turn, give it to you free of charge, with no expectation of recompense except a hope that you'll enjoy it and that maybe, in the future, you might be interested in some others of my works -- whatever forum they may appear in.

I wrote this about a year ago, down in Louisiana: But the moon is gibbous )



References:
First seen (by me) in [livejournal.com profile] cc_wolff's locked post here
Pertinent selections of Hendrix's rant at Warren Ellis' blog here

Profile

yrmencyn: (Default)
yrmencyn

December 2009

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 29th, 2025 10:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios